You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Associations of Patient-Rated Emotional Bond and Vocally Encoded Emotional Arousal Among Clinicians and Acutely Suicidal Military Personnel
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, April 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1037/ccp0000295 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Craig J. Bryan, Brian R. Baucom, Alex O. Crenshaw, Zac Imel, David C. Atkins, Tracy A. Clemans, Bruce Leeson, T. Scott Burch, Jim Mintz, M. David Rudd |
| Abstract |
To determine if synchrony in emotional arousal and affective regulation between patients and clinicians reflect emotional bonding during emergency behavioral health appointments. Audio recordings of suicide risk assessment interviews and crisis intervention planning with 54 suicidal active duty soldiers presenting to an emergency department or behavioral health clinic were analyzed. Emotional arousal was assessed using mean fundamental frequency. Patient-rated emotional bond was assessed with the Working Alliance Inventory, Short Form (Hatcher & Gillaspy, 2014). Actor-partner interdependence modeling was used to identify moment-to-moment patterns of covariance among clinician and patient emotional arousal. Greater synchrony in clinician and patient emotional arousal was positively associated with higher emotional bond ratings during the crisis intervention but not the risk assessment interview. During the risk assessment interview, higher emotional bond was associated with a dysregulating effect of the clinician on the patient's emotional arousal (i.e., larger fluctuations in the patient's emotional arousal). The reverse pattern was seen during the intervention: Higher emotional bond was associated with a regulating effect of the clinician on the patient's emotional arousal (i.e., smaller fluctuations in the patient's emotional arousal). Emotional bond during the intervention was also positively associated with a regulating effect of the patient on the clinician's emotional arousal. Emotional bonding during emergency clinical encounters is associated with patient-clinician synchrony in emotional states. During crisis interventions, emotional bonding is also associated with mutual down-regulation of emotional arousal among patients and clinicians. (PsycINFO Database Record |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 50% |
| Canada | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 82 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 9% |
| Researcher | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 13 | 16% |
| Unknown | 24 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 36 | 44% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 30 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2018.
All research outputs
#14,777,935
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
#3,003
of 4,627 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#174,681
of 343,807 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
#11
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,627 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,807 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.