↓ Skip to main content

Predicting Imminent Suicidal Thoughts and Nonfatal Attempts: The Role of Complexity

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Psychological Science, May 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Predicting Imminent Suicidal Thoughts and Nonfatal Attempts: The Role of Complexity
Published in
Clinical Psychological Science, May 2019
DOI 10.1177/2167702619838464
Authors

Jessica D. Ribeiro, Xieyining Huang, Kathryn R. Fox, Colin G. Walsh, Kathryn P. Linthicum

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 61 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 15%
Student > Master 7 11%
Student > Bachelor 6 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Other 9 15%
Unknown 21 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 23 38%
Unspecified 3 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 25 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2019.
All research outputs
#2,676,887
of 23,299,593 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Psychological Science
#559
of 787 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,834
of 350,654 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Psychological Science
#16
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,299,593 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 787 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 47.3. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,654 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.