You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Clinical Utility of Suicide Behavior and Ideation Measures: Implications for Military Suicide Risk Assessment
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Psychological Assessment, January 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1037/pas0000876 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Peter M. Gutierrez, Thomas Joiner, Jetta Hanson, Kayla Avery, Alex Fender, Teresa Harrison, Keesha Kerns, Peter McGowan, Ian H. Stanley, Caroline Silva, Megan L. Rogers |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 4 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 43 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 12% |
| Researcher | 5 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 22 | 51% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 11 | 26% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 2% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 2% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 25 | 58% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 December 2020.
All research outputs
#8,481,307
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Psychological Assessment
#470
of 1,776 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#198,479
of 519,474 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychological Assessment
#6
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,776 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 519,474 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.