↓ Skip to main content

Sleep problems outperform depression and hopelessness as cross-sectional and longitudinal predictors of suicidal ideation and behavior in young adults in the military

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Affective Disorders, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
twitter
5 X users
wikipedia
18 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
269 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
298 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Sleep problems outperform depression and hopelessness as cross-sectional and longitudinal predictors of suicidal ideation and behavior in young adults in the military
Published in
Journal of Affective Disorders, October 2011
DOI 10.1016/j.jad.2011.09.049
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jessica D. Ribeiro, James L. Pease, Peter M. Gutierrez, Caroline Silva, Rebecca A. Bernert, M. David Rudd, Thomas E. Joiner

Abstract

Sleep problems appear to represent an underappreciated and important warning sign and risk factor for suicidal behaviors. Given past research indicating that disturbed sleep may confer such risk independent of depressed mood, in the present report we compared self-reported insomnia symptoms to several more traditional, well-established suicide risk factors: depression severity, hopelessness, PTSD diagnosis, as well as anxiety, drug abuse, and alcohol abuse symptoms.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 298 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 2%
Rwanda 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Unknown 291 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 42 14%
Student > Master 37 12%
Student > Bachelor 33 11%
Researcher 29 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 26 9%
Other 64 21%
Unknown 67 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 128 43%
Medicine and Dentistry 37 12%
Social Sciences 14 5%
Neuroscience 8 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 2%
Other 23 8%
Unknown 82 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 39. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 November 2019.
All research outputs
#1,034,124
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Affective Disorders
#613
of 10,144 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,338
of 152,373 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Affective Disorders
#3
of 82 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,144 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 152,373 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 82 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.