| Title |
Long-term soy isoflavone supplementation and cognition in women
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Neurology, June 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1212/wnl.0b013e318258f822 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
V.W. Henderson, J.A. St. John, H.N. Hodis, N. Kono, C.A. McCleary, A.A. Franke, W.J. Mack |
| Abstract |
To determine the cognitive effects of long-term dietary soy isoflavones in a daily dose comparable to that of traditional Asian diets. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 25% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 13% |
| Japan | 3 | 13% |
| Spain | 2 | 8% |
| Italy | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 9 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 17 | 71% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 21% |
| Scientists | 1 | 4% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 115 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 27 | 23% |
| Student > Bachelor | 24 | 21% |
| Researcher | 10 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 17 | 15% |
| Unknown | 25 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 26 | 22% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 19 | 16% |
| Psychology | 10 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 8% |
| Neuroscience | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 16 | 14% |
| Unknown | 29 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 October 2022.
All research outputs
#1,628,504
of 25,708,267 outputs
Outputs from Neurology
#2,950
of 21,099 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,167
of 181,392 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neurology
#16
of 316 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,708,267 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 21,099 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 181,392 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 316 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.