| Title |
Citations increase with manuscript length, author number, and references cited in ecology journals
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ecology and Evolution, October 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1002/ece3.2505 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Charles W. Fox, C. E. Timothy Paine, Boris Sauterey |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 68 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 13 | 19% |
| United States | 10 | 15% |
| Sweden | 5 | 7% |
| Spain | 4 | 6% |
| Germany | 2 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 3% |
| Australia | 2 | 3% |
| Norway | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 9 | 13% |
| Unknown | 19 | 28% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 36 | 53% |
| Members of the public | 28 | 41% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 145 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 140 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 26 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 16% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 41 | 28% |
| Unknown | 24 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 52 | 36% |
| Environmental Science | 21 | 14% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 5 | 3% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 19 | 13% |
| Unknown | 34 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 55. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2022.
All research outputs
#784,367
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Ecology and Evolution
#335
of 8,703 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,786
of 331,572 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecology and Evolution
#5
of 148 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,703 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,572 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 148 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.