↓ Skip to main content

Wiley Online Library

Hysterectomy‐corrected cervical cancer mortality rates reveal a larger racial disparity in the United States

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer (0008543X), January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#4 of 14,098)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
141 news outlets
blogs
8 blogs
policy
3 policy sources
twitter
65 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
5 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
175 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
189 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Hysterectomy‐corrected cervical cancer mortality rates reveal a larger racial disparity in the United States
Published in
Cancer (0008543X), January 2017
DOI 10.1002/cncr.30507
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anna L. Beavis, Patti E. Gravitt, Anne F. Rositch

Abstract

The objectives of this study were to determine the age-standardized and age-specific annual US cervical cancer mortality rates after correction for the prevalence of hysterectomy and to evaluate disparities by age and race. Estimates for deaths due to cervical cancer stratified by age, state, year, and race were derived from the National Center for Health Statistics county mortality data (2000-2012). Equivalently stratified data on the prevalence of hysterectomy for women 20 years old or older from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System survey were used to remove women who were not at risk from the denominator. Age-specific and age-standardized mortality rates were computed, and trends in mortality rates were analyzed with Joinpoint regression. Age-standardized rates were higher for both races after correction. For black women, the corrected mortality rate was 10.1 per 100,000 (95% confidence interval [CI], 9.6-10.6), whereas the uncorrected rate was 5.7 per 100,000 (95% CI, 5.5-6.0). The corrected rate for white women was 4.7 per 100,000 (95% CI, 4.6-4.8), whereas the uncorrected rate was 3.2 per 100,000 (95% CI, 3.1-3.2). Without the correction, the disparity in mortality between races was underestimated by 44%. Black women who were 85 years old or older had the highest corrected rate: 37.2 deaths per 100,000. A trend analysis of corrected rates demonstrated that white women's rates decreased at 0.8% per year, whereas the annual decrease for black women was 3.6% (P < .05). A correction for hysterectomy has revealed that cervical cancer mortality rates are underestimated, particularly in black women. The highest rates are seen in the oldest black women, and public health efforts should focus on appropriate screening and adequate treatment in this population. Cancer 2017. © 2017 American Cancer Society.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 65 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 189 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 187 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 16%
Student > Master 27 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 23 12%
Researcher 16 8%
Other 16 8%
Other 34 18%
Unknown 43 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 52 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 26 14%
Social Sciences 12 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 4%
Other 24 13%
Unknown 58 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1196. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 February 2024.
All research outputs
#11,806
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Cancer (0008543X)
#4
of 14,098 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#206
of 422,539 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer (0008543X)
#1
of 156 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,098 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 422,539 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 156 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.