| Title |
Drones count wildlife more accurately and precisely than humans
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Methods in Ecology and Evolution, February 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1111/2041-210x.12974 |
| Authors |
Jarrod C. Hodgson, Rowan Mott, Shane M. Baylis, Trung T. Pham, Simon Wotherspoon, Adam D. Kilpatrick, Ramesh Raja Segaran, Ian Reid, Aleks Terauds, Lian Pin Koh |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 236 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 42 | 18% |
| Australia | 25 | 11% |
| United States | 20 | 8% |
| Canada | 13 | 6% |
| Spain | 7 | 3% |
| France | 5 | 2% |
| Germany | 4 | 2% |
| Colombia | 4 | 2% |
| South Africa | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 36 | 15% |
| Unknown | 77 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 160 | 68% |
| Scientists | 67 | 28% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 9 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 673 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 673 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 106 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 106 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 93 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 72 | 11% |
| Other | 61 | 9% |
| Other | 84 | 12% |
| Unknown | 151 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 231 | 34% |
| Environmental Science | 146 | 22% |
| Engineering | 29 | 4% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 16 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 15 | 2% |
| Other | 64 | 10% |
| Unknown | 172 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 425. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 October 2022.
All research outputs
#69,262
of 25,791,495 outputs
Outputs from Methods in Ecology and Evolution
#8
of 2,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,763
of 458,038 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in Ecology and Evolution
#1
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,791,495 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,467 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 458,038 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.