| Title |
Biochar‐Based Fertilization with Liquid Nutrient Enrichment: 21 Field Trials Covering 13 Crop Species in Nepal
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Land Degradation & Development, August 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1002/ldr.2761 |
| Authors |
Hans‐Peter Schmidt, Bishnu Hari Pandit, Gerard Cornelissen, Claudia I. Kammann |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 200 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 200 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 30 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 28 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 28 | 14% |
| Unknown | 68 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 54 | 27% |
| Environmental Science | 21 | 11% |
| Chemistry | 7 | 4% |
| Engineering | 7 | 4% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 22 | 11% |
| Unknown | 84 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 December 2022.
All research outputs
#5,629,250
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Land Degradation & Development
#189
of 997 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,288
of 331,115 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Land Degradation & Development
#6
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 997 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,115 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.