↓ Skip to main content

Hierarchical complexity and the size limits of life

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
96 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
118 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Hierarchical complexity and the size limits of life
Published in
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, June 2017
DOI 10.1098/rspb.2017.1039
Pubmed ID
Authors

Noel A. Heim, Jonathan L. Payne, Seth Finnegan, Matthew L. Knope, Michał Kowalewski, S. Kathleen Lyons, Daniel W. McShea, Philip M. Novack-Gottshall, Felisa A. Smith, Steve C. Wang

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 96 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 118 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 117 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 25%
Researcher 23 19%
Student > Bachelor 10 8%
Professor 8 7%
Student > Master 7 6%
Other 20 17%
Unknown 20 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 34 29%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 25 21%
Environmental Science 11 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 7%
Computer Science 3 3%
Other 13 11%
Unknown 24 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 51. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2020.
All research outputs
#843,148
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#2,038
of 11,685 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,412
of 333,621 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#47
of 151 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,685 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,621 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 151 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.