↓ Skip to main content

Limited role of functional differentiation in early diversification of animals

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Communications, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
40 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
90 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Limited role of functional differentiation in early diversification of animals
Published in
Nature Communications, March 2015
DOI 10.1038/ncomms7455
Pubmed ID
Authors

M.L. Knope, N.A. Heim, L.O. Frishkoff, J.L. Payne

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 40 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Germany 1 1%
Slovenia 1 1%
Argentina 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 84 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 21 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 20%
Student > Master 10 11%
Student > Bachelor 8 9%
Professor 7 8%
Other 14 16%
Unknown 12 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 40 44%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 24 27%
Environmental Science 5 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 1%
Other 3 3%
Unknown 14 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 67. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2016.
All research outputs
#645,643
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#11,143
of 58,242 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,726
of 273,514 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#105
of 767 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 58,242 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 273,514 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 767 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.