↓ Skip to main content

Greater vulnerability to warming of marine versus terrestrial ectotherms

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
460 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
773 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Greater vulnerability to warming of marine versus terrestrial ectotherms
Published in
Nature, April 2019
DOI 10.1038/s41586-019-1132-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Malin L. Pinsky, Anne Maria Eikeset, Douglas J. McCauley, Jonathan L. Payne, Jennifer M. Sunday

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 343 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 773 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 773 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 132 17%
Researcher 121 16%
Student > Bachelor 101 13%
Student > Master 95 12%
Other 32 4%
Other 100 13%
Unknown 192 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 227 29%
Environmental Science 177 23%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 36 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 34 4%
Social Sciences 11 1%
Other 57 7%
Unknown 231 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 610. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 January 2024.
All research outputs
#38,145
of 25,880,948 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#3,329
of 99,010 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#750
of 365,932 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#80
of 1,033 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,880,948 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 99,010 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,932 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,033 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.