↓ Skip to main content

Limits and potential of targeted sequencing analysis of liquid biopsy in patients with lung and colon carcinoma

Overview of attention for article published in Oncotarget, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
78 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
116 Mendeley
Title
Limits and potential of targeted sequencing analysis of liquid biopsy in patients with lung and colon carcinoma
Published in
Oncotarget, July 2016
DOI 10.18632/oncotarget.10704
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anna Maria Rachiglio, Riziero Esposito Abate, Alessandra Sacco, Raffaella Pasquale, Francesca Fenizia, Matilde Lambiase, Alessandro Morabito, Agnese Montanino, Gaetano Rocco, Carmen Romano, Anna Nappi, Rosario Vincenzo Iaffaioli, Fabiana Tatangelo, Gerardo Botti, Fortunato Ciardiello, Monica R. Maiello, Antonella De Luca, Nicola Normanno

Abstract

The circulating free tumor DNA (ctDNA) represents an alternative, minimally invasive source of tumor DNA for molecular profiling. Targeted sequencing with next generation sequencing (NGS) can assess hundred mutations starting from a low DNA input. We performed NGS analysis of ctDNA from 44 patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) and 35 patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma (CRC). NGS detected EGFR mutations in 17/22 plasma samples from EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients (sensitivity 77.3%). The concordance rate between tissue and plasma in NSCLC was much lower for other mutations such as KRAS that, based on the allelic frequency and the fraction of neoplastic cells, were likely to be sub-clonal. NGS also identified EGFR mutations in plasma samples from two patients with EGFR wild type tumor tissue. Both mutations were confirmed by droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) in both plasma and tissue samples. In CRC, the sensitivity of the NGS plasma analysis for RAS mutations was 100% (6/6) in patients that had not resection of the primary tumor before blood drawing, and 46.2% (6/13) in patients with primary tumor resected before enrollment. Our study showed that NGS is a suitable method for plasma testing. However, its clinical sensitivity is significantly affected by the presence of the primary tumor and by the heterogeneity of driver mutations.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 116 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 116 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 21 18%
Other 13 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 11%
Student > Master 13 11%
Student > Bachelor 12 10%
Other 20 17%
Unknown 24 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 43 37%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 24 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 11%
Computer Science 3 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 <1%
Other 5 4%
Unknown 27 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 October 2020.
All research outputs
#2,063,868
of 25,220,525 outputs
Outputs from Oncotarget
#924
of 14,278 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,221
of 372,672 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oncotarget
#38
of 1,307 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,220,525 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,278 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 372,672 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,307 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.