| Title |
Developing an international network for Alzheimer’s research: the Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Network
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Investigation, October 2012
|
| DOI | 10.4155/cli.12.93 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
John C Morris, Paul S Aisen, Randall J Bateman, Tammie LS Benzinger, Nigel J Cairns, Anne M Fagan, Bernardino Ghetti, Alison M Goate, David M Holtzman, William E Klunk, Eric McDade, Daniel S Marcus, Ralph N Martins, Colin L Masters, Richard Mayeux, Angela Oliver, Kimberly Quaid, John M Ringman, Martin N Rossor, Stephen Salloway, Peter R Schofield, Natalie J Selsor, Reisa A Sperling, Michael W Weiner, Chengjie Xiong, Krista L Moulder, Virginia D Buckles |
| Abstract |
The Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Network (DIAN) is a collaborative effort of international Alzheimer disease (AD) centers that are conducting a multifaceted prospective biomarker study in individuals at-risk for autosomal dominant AD (ADAD). DIAN collects comprehensive information and tissue in accordance with standard protocols from asymptomatic and symptomatic ADAD mutation carriers and their non-carrier family members to determine the pathochronology of clinical, cognitive, neuroimaging, and fluid biomarkers of AD. This article describes the structure, implementation, and underlying principles of DIAN, as well as the demographic features of the initial DIAN cohort. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 50% |
| Australia | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 104 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 32 | 31% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 14 | 13% |
| Unknown | 19 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 26 | 25% |
| Neuroscience | 19 | 18% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 9% |
| Psychology | 6 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 15 | 14% |
| Unknown | 25 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 August 2022.
All research outputs
#2,307,250
of 23,006,268 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Investigation
#6
of 115 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,178
of 172,848 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Investigation
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,006,268 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 115 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,848 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them