↓ Skip to main content

Policy Surveillance: A Vital Public Health Practice Comes of Age

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
72 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
90 Mendeley
Title
Policy Surveillance: A Vital Public Health Practice Comes of Age
Published in
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, August 2016
DOI 10.1215/03616878-3665931
Pubmed ID
Authors

Scott Burris, Laura Hitchcock, Jennifer Ibrahim, Matthew Penn, Tara Ramanathan

Abstract

Governments use statutes, regulations, and policies, often in innovative ways, to promote health and safety. Organizations outside government, from private schools to major corporations, create rules on matters as diverse as tobacco use and paid sick leave. Very little of this activity is systematically tracked. Even as the rest of the health system is working to build, share, and use a wide range of health and social data, legal information largely remains trapped in text files and pdfs, excluded from the universe of usable data. This article makes the case for the practice of policy surveillance to help end the anomalous treatment of law in public health research and practice. Policy surveillance is the systematic, scientific collection and analysis of laws of public health significance. It meets several important needs. Scientific collection and coding of important laws and policies creates data suitable for use in rigorous evaluation studies. Policy surveillance addresses the chronic lack of readily accessible, nonpartisan information about status and trends in health legislation and policy. It provides the opportunity to build policy capacity in the public health workforce. We trace its emergence over the past fifty years, show its value, and identify major challenges ahead.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 90 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 14%
Researcher 9 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Student > Bachelor 5 6%
Other 15 17%
Unknown 29 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 21 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 12%
Business, Management and Accounting 5 6%
Engineering 5 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 3%
Other 14 16%
Unknown 31 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2024.
All research outputs
#2,226,554
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law
#173
of 1,110 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,035
of 337,640 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law
#2
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,110 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 337,640 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.