↓ Skip to main content

Newborn screening for critical congenital heart disease: Essential public health roles for birth defects monitoring programs

Overview of attention for article published in Birth Defects Research Part A Clinical and Molecular Teratology, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Newborn screening for critical congenital heart disease: Essential public health roles for birth defects monitoring programs
Published in
Birth Defects Research Part A Clinical and Molecular Teratology, November 2012
DOI 10.1002/bdra.23103
Pubmed ID
Authors

Richard S. Olney, Lorenzo D. Botto

Abstract

Newborn screening for critical congenital heart defects, added in September 2011 to the Recommended Uniform Screening Panel in the United States, is a new public health priority and has particular relevance for state birth defects surveillance programs. In this commentary, we review the background to potential involvement by birth defects programs with screening, and detail key questions that these programs can evaluate: (1) health outcomes after newborn screening among affected children; (2) missed primary targets of screening (i.e., affected children who were not screened or had false-negative screens); (3) burden and screening accuracy for secondary targets; (4) the role of altitude, sociodemographic characteristics, and other special circumstances; (5) the contribution of prenatal and clinical diagnoses before newborn screening; and (6) costs and service utilization. To address these issues, monitoring programs will need to pay particular attention to: (1) data sources and quality; (2) timeliness; (3) long-term follow-up for comprehensive outcomes; (4) reporting standards; and (5) state and national program coordination. Although some aspects of involvement with these screening programs will require new partnerships and paradigm shifts in birth defects program operations, the visibility of these screening programs among stakeholders will also provide birth defects programs with new opportunities to demonstrate their usefulness.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 4%
Unknown 26 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 15%
Student > Master 4 15%
Student > Bachelor 4 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Other 5 19%
Unknown 7 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 52%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 7%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 4%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 6 22%