↓ Skip to main content

Ethical considerations of population screening for late‐onset genetic disease

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Genetics, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
Title
Ethical considerations of population screening for late‐onset genetic disease
Published in
Clinical Genetics, March 2015
DOI 10.1111/cge.12566
Pubmed ID
Authors

K. Golden‐Grant, J.L. Merritt, C.R. Scott

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 6%
Unknown 45 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 21%
Student > Master 7 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 8%
Other 4 8%
Other 12 25%
Unknown 7 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 42%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Social Sciences 2 4%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 9 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2016.
All research outputs
#22,012,573
of 24,558,777 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Genetics
#2,415
of 2,558 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#228,610
of 266,399 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Genetics
#16
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,558,777 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,558 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,399 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.