| Title |
Stakeholder views on secondary findings in whole-genome and whole-exome sequencing: a systematic review of quantitative and qualitative studies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Genetics in Medicine, September 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1038/gim.2016.109 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michael P. Mackley, Benjamin Fletcher, Michael Parker, Hugh Watkins, Elizabeth Ormondroyd |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 17% |
| United States | 4 | 17% |
| Canada | 3 | 13% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 4% |
| Australia | 1 | 4% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 9 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 14 | 61% |
| Members of the public | 8 | 35% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 129 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 128 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 17 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 12% |
| Other | 15 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 8% |
| Other | 19 | 15% |
| Unknown | 39 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 25 | 19% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 19% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 5% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 12 | 9% |
| Unknown | 44 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2019.
All research outputs
#1,379,734
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Genetics in Medicine
#436
of 2,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,694
of 353,959 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genetics in Medicine
#16
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,978 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,959 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.