↓ Skip to main content

ACMG Practice Guideline: lack of evidence for MTHFR polymorphism testing

Overview of attention for article published in Genetics in Medicine, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
18 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
285 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
ACMG Practice Guideline: lack of evidence for MTHFR polymorphism testing
Published in
Genetics in Medicine, January 2013
DOI 10.1038/gim.2012.165
Pubmed ID
Authors

Scott E. Hickey, Cynthia J. Curry, Helga V. Toriello

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 285 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 1%
Brazil 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Unknown 277 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 52 18%
Student > Master 41 14%
Researcher 31 11%
Student > Bachelor 23 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 6%
Other 70 25%
Unknown 50 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 96 34%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 57 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 35 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 2%
Other 25 9%
Unknown 59 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 71. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 April 2024.
All research outputs
#605,583
of 25,403,829 outputs
Outputs from Genetics in Medicine
#161
of 2,948 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,326
of 289,098 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genetics in Medicine
#2
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,403,829 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,948 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 289,098 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.