↓ Skip to main content

Genome privacy: challenges, technical approaches to mitigate risk, and ethical considerations in the United States

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
34 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
102 Mendeley
Title
Genome privacy: challenges, technical approaches to mitigate risk, and ethical considerations in the United States
Published in
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, September 2016
DOI 10.1111/nyas.13259
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shuang Wang, Xiaoqian Jiang, Siddharth Singh, Rebecca Marmor, Luca Bonomi, Dov Fox, Michelle Dow, Lucila Ohno‐Machado

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 101 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 17%
Student > Master 14 14%
Researcher 10 10%
Student > Bachelor 8 8%
Other 6 6%
Other 15 15%
Unknown 32 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 15 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 5%
Social Sciences 4 4%
Other 17 17%
Unknown 38 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 December 2023.
All research outputs
#4,894,961
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
#2,080
of 12,128 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,805
of 332,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
#21
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,128 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,714 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.