↓ Skip to main content

Time until emergence of HIV test reactivity following infection with HIV-1: Implications for interpreting test results and retesting after exposure

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Infectious Diseases, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
9 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
90 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
93 Mendeley
Title
Time until emergence of HIV test reactivity following infection with HIV-1: Implications for interpreting test results and retesting after exposure
Published in
Clinical Infectious Diseases, October 2016
DOI 10.1093/cid/ciw666
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kevin P. Delaney, Debra L. Hanson, Silvina Masciotra, Steven F. Ethridge, Laura Wesolowski, S. Michele Owen

Abstract

 Understanding the period of time between an exposure resulting in infection with HIV and when a test can reliably detect the presence of that infection, i.e. the test window period, may benefit testing programs and clinicians in counseling patients about when the clinician and the patient can be confident a suspected exposure did not result in HIV infection.  We evaluated the intervals between reactivity of the Aptima HIV-1 RNA nucleic acid test (Aptima) and 20 FDA-approved HIV immunoassays using 222 longitudinally collected plasma specimens from HIV-1 seroconverters from the United States. A multi-model framework based upon two general approaches, interval-censored survival and binomial regression, was implemented to estimate the relative emergence of test reactivity, referred to in this report as an inter-test reactivity interval (ITRI). We then combined ITRI results with simulated data for the eclipse period, the time between exposure and detection of HIV virus by Aptima, to develop estimates of the window period for each test.  The estimated ITRIs were shorter with each new class of HIV tests, ranging from 5.9 to 24.8 days. The 99(th) percentiles of the window period probability distribution ranged from 44 days for laboratory screening tests that detect both antigen and antibody to 65 days for the Western blot test.  Our directly comparable estimates of the emergence of reactivity for 20 immunoassays are valuable to testing providers for interpreting negative HIV test results obtained shortly after exposure, and for counseling individuals on when to retest after an exposure.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 93 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 21 23%
Student > Master 11 12%
Student > Bachelor 11 12%
Other 7 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 8%
Other 13 14%
Unknown 23 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 31%
Immunology and Microbiology 11 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Other 14 15%
Unknown 27 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 December 2022.
All research outputs
#2,937,271
of 22,788,370 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Infectious Diseases
#4,637
of 15,782 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,419
of 319,591 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Infectious Diseases
#52
of 136 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,788,370 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,782 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,591 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 136 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.