| Title |
Eligibility and Disqualification Recommendations for Competitive Athletes With Cardiovascular Abnormalities: Preamble, Principles, and General Considerations A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association and American College of Cardiology
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JACC, November 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.09.032 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Barry J. Maron, Douglas P. Zipes, Richard J. Kovacs |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 34 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 12 | 35% |
| United States | 3 | 9% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 3% |
| Mexico | 1 | 3% |
| Indonesia | 1 | 3% |
| Dominican Republic | 1 | 3% |
| Panama | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 14 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 25 | 74% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 12% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 9% |
| Scientists | 2 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 147 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 142 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 23 | 16% |
| Researcher | 18 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 10 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 6% |
| Professor | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 32 | 22% |
| Unknown | 46 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 71 | 48% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 5% |
| Sports and Recreations | 5 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 6% |
| Unknown | 48 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 46. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 December 2020.
All research outputs
#899,520
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from JACC
#2,252
of 16,740 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,658
of 296,365 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC
#37
of 257 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,740 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 296,365 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 257 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.