↓ Skip to main content

Eligibility and Disqualification Recommendations for Competitive Athletes With Cardiovascular Abnormalities: Task Force 7: Aortic Diseases, Including Marfan Syndrome A Scientific Statement From the…

Overview of attention for article published in JACC, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
65 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
90 Mendeley
Title
Eligibility and Disqualification Recommendations for Competitive Athletes With Cardiovascular Abnormalities: Task Force 7: Aortic Diseases, Including Marfan Syndrome A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association and American College of Cardiology
Published in
JACC, November 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.09.039
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alan C. Braverman, Kevin M. Harris, Richard J. Kovacs, Barry J. Maron

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 1%
Czechia 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 85 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 11 12%
Researcher 10 11%
Student > Master 9 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 9%
Professor 7 8%
Other 26 29%
Unknown 19 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 51 57%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 3%
Sports and Recreations 2 2%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 1%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 28 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 November 2020.
All research outputs
#7,960,693
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from JACC
#9,541
of 16,740 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,153
of 296,365 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC
#178
of 257 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,740 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.0. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 296,365 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 257 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.