| Title |
Statins for Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease in Adults: Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, November 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1001/jama.2015.15629 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Roger Chou, Tracy Dana, Ian Blazina, Monica Daeges, Thomas L. Jeanne |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 177 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 25 | 14% |
| United States | 23 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 15 | 8% |
| Japan | 8 | 5% |
| Mexico | 7 | 4% |
| Canada | 4 | 2% |
| Australia | 3 | 2% |
| France | 3 | 2% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 19 | 11% |
| Unknown | 67 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 131 | 74% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 30 | 17% |
| Scientists | 15 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 318 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 316 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 38 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 35 | 11% |
| Researcher | 34 | 11% |
| Other | 32 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 28 | 9% |
| Other | 58 | 18% |
| Unknown | 93 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 127 | 40% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 23 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 20 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 3% |
| Neuroscience | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 34 | 11% |
| Unknown | 99 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 384. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2024.
All research outputs
#81,935
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#1,453
of 36,773 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,731
of 312,878 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#40
of 408 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 36,773 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 72.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,878 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 408 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.