↓ Skip to main content

ACMG position statement on prenatal/preconception expanded carrier screening

Overview of attention for article published in Genetics in Medicine, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
5 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
271 Mendeley
Title
ACMG position statement on prenatal/preconception expanded carrier screening
Published in
Genetics in Medicine, April 2013
DOI 10.1038/gim.2013.47
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wayne W. Grody, Barry H. Thompson, Anthony R. Gregg, Lora H. Bean, Kristin G. Monaghan, Adele Schneider, Roger V. Lebo

Abstract

For years, clinicians have offered gene-by-gene carrier screening to patients and couples considering future pregnancy or those with an ongoing pregnancy early in gestation. Examples include ethnic-specific screening offered to Ashkenazi Jewish patients and panethnic screening for cystic fibrosis and spinal muscular atrophy. Next-generation sequencing methods now available permit screening for many more disorders with high fidelity, quick turnaround time, and lower costs. However, instituting these technologies carries with it perils that must be addressed. The basis for the selection of disorders on expanded carrier screening panels should be disclosed. The information provided about disorders with mild phenotypes, variable expression, low penetrance, and/or characterized by an adult onset should be complete and transparent, allowing patients to opt out of receiving these test results. Patients also must be made aware of the concept of residual risk following negative test results. Laboratories have a duty to participate in and facilitate this information transfer.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 271 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 2%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 265 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 53 20%
Researcher 38 14%
Student > Bachelor 34 13%
Other 30 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 10%
Other 41 15%
Unknown 49 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 72 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 65 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 47 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 4%
Social Sciences 7 3%
Other 13 5%
Unknown 57 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 October 2021.
All research outputs
#1,580,390
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Genetics in Medicine
#528
of 2,943 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,484
of 205,935 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genetics in Medicine
#5
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,943 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 205,935 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.