↓ Skip to main content

Mortality risk of black women and white women with invasive breast cancer by hormone receptors, HER2, and p53 status

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Cancer, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
Title
Mortality risk of black women and white women with invasive breast cancer by hormone receptors, HER2, and p53 status
Published in
BMC Cancer, May 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2407-13-225
Pubmed ID
Authors

Huiyan Ma, Yani Lu, Kathleen E Malone, Polly A Marchbanks, Dennis M Deapen, Robert Spirtas, Ronald T Burkman, Brian L Strom, Jill A McDonald, Suzanne G Folger, Michael S Simon, Jane Sullivan-Halley, Michael F Press, Leslie Bernstein

Abstract

Black women are more likely than white women to have an aggressive subtype of breast cancer that is associated with higher mortality and this may contribute to the observed black-white difference in mortality. However, few studies have investigated the black-white disparity in mortality risk stratified by breast cancer subtype, defined by estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status. Furthermore, it is not known whether additional consideration of p53 protein status influences black-white differences in mortality risk observed when considering subtypes defined by ER, PR and HER2 status.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 2%
Switzerland 1 2%
Unknown 58 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 17%
Student > Master 10 17%
Researcher 4 7%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 7%
Other 16 27%
Unknown 12 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 7%
Social Sciences 4 7%
Other 7 12%
Unknown 16 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 October 2013.
All research outputs
#13,309,658
of 22,709,015 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cancer
#2,925
of 8,259 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#101,221
of 192,836 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cancer
#55
of 102 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,709,015 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,259 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,836 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 102 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.