| Title |
A Toolkit to assess health needs for congenital disorders in low- and middle-income countries: an instrument for public health action
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Public Health, May 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1093/pubmed/fdt048 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
L.C. Nacul, A. Stewart, C. Alberg, S. Chowdhury, M.W. Darlison, C. Grollman, A. Hall, B. Modell, S. Moorthie, G.S. Sagoo, H. Burton |
| Abstract |
In 2010 the World Health Assembly called for action to improve the care and prevention of congenital disorders, noting that technical guidance would be required for this task, especially in low- and middle-income countries. Responding to this call, we have developed a freely available web-accessible Toolkit for assessing health needs for congenital disorders. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 65 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 12 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 9% |
| Other | 15 | 22% |
| Unknown | 11 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 24% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 19% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 7% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 8 | 12% |
| Unknown | 16 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2022.
All research outputs
#4,373,952
of 25,394,081 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Public Health
#832
of 3,014 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,704
of 205,475 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Public Health
#12
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,081 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,014 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 205,475 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.