| Title |
Familial breast cancer: summary of updated NICE guidance
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Medical Journal, June 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1136/bmj.f3829 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
D Gareth Evans, John Graham, Susan O’Connell, Stephanie Arnold, Deborah Fitzsimmons |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 17% |
| United States | 4 | 17% |
| Spain | 3 | 13% |
| Canada | 2 | 8% |
| Chile | 1 | 4% |
| Bosnia and Herzegovina | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 9 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 17 | 71% |
| Scientists | 4 | 17% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 64 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 12 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 15% |
| Other | 9 | 13% |
| Researcher | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 9% |
| Other | 14 | 21% |
| Unknown | 9 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 30 | 45% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 7% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Unknown | 11 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 October 2013.
All research outputs
#2,285,516
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from British Medical Journal
#20,101
of 64,457 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,196
of 208,943 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Medical Journal
#261
of 889 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 64,457 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 208,943 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 889 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.