↓ Skip to main content

Genetics of early-onset Parkinson's disease in Finland: exome sequencing and genome-wide association study

Overview of attention for article published in Neurobiology of Aging, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Genetics of early-onset Parkinson's disease in Finland: exome sequencing and genome-wide association study
Published in
Neurobiology of Aging, February 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2017.01.019
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ari Siitonen, Michael A. Nalls, Dena Hernández, J. Raphael Gibbs, Jinhui Ding, Pauli Ylikotila, Connor Edsall, Andrew Singleton, Kari Majamaa

Abstract

Several genes and risk factors are associated with Parkinson's disease (PD). Although many of the genetic markers belong to a common pathway, a unifying pathogenetic mechanism is yet to be found. Also, missing heritability analyses have estimated that only part of the genetic influence contributing to PD has been found. Here, we carried out whole-exome sequencing (WES) on 438 Finnish patients with early-onset PD. We also reanalyzed previous data from genome-wide association studies (GWAS) on the same cohort. Variants in the CEL gene/locus were associated with PD in both GWAS and WES analysis. Exome-wide gene-based association tests also identified the MPHOSPH10, TAS2R19, and SERPINA1 genes in the discovery data set (p < 2.5E-6). MPHOSPH10 had estimated odds ratio (OR) of 1.53, and the rs141620200 variant in SERPINA1 had OR of 1.27. We identified several candidate genes, but further investigation is required to determine the role of these genes in PD.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 59 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 15%
Researcher 8 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 14%
Student > Bachelor 7 12%
Other 4 7%
Other 8 14%
Unknown 15 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 15%
Neuroscience 5 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 7%
Computer Science 2 3%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 19 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 May 2017.
All research outputs
#3,205,236
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Neurobiology of Aging
#1,017
of 4,418 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,296
of 424,744 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neurobiology of Aging
#29
of 90 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,418 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 424,744 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 90 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.