↓ Skip to main content

Molecular Biomarkers for the Evaluation of Colorectal Cancer: Guideline From the American Society for Clinical Pathology, College of American Pathologists, Association for Molecular Pathology, and…

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#6 of 2,767)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
62 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
twitter
65 X users
facebook
7 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
81 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
157 Mendeley
Title
Molecular Biomarkers for the Evaluation of Colorectal Cancer: Guideline From the American Society for Clinical Pathology, College of American Pathologists, Association for Molecular Pathology, and American Society of Clinical Oncology
Published in
Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, February 2017
DOI 10.5858/arpa.2016-0554-cp
Pubmed ID
Authors

Antonia R Sepulveda, Stanley R Hamilton, Carmen J Allegra, Wayne Grody, Allison M Cushman-Vokoun, William K Funkhouser, Scott E Kopetz, Christopher Lieu, Noralane M Lindor, Bruce D Minsky, Federico A Monzon, Daniel J Sargent, Veena M Singh, Joseph Willis, Jennifer Clark, Carol Colasacco, R Bryan Rumble, Robyn Temple-Smolkin, Christina B Ventura, Jan A Nowak

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 65 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 157 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 157 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 22 14%
Student > Master 22 14%
Student > Bachelor 17 11%
Other 16 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 7%
Other 29 18%
Unknown 40 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 62 39%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 20 13%
Unspecified 8 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 3%
Other 17 11%
Unknown 40 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 531. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 November 2022.
All research outputs
#47,708
of 25,775,807 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine
#6
of 2,767 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,042
of 427,178 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine
#2
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,775,807 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,767 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 427,178 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.