↓ Skip to main content

American Association Of Clinical Endocrinologists And American College Of Endocrinology Guidelines For Management Of Dyslipidemia And Prevention Of Cardiovascular Disease - Executive Summary

Overview of attention for article published in Endocrine Practice, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#37 of 1,139)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
9 news outlets
twitter
3 X users
patent
1 patent
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
197 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
349 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
American Association Of Clinical Endocrinologists And American College Of Endocrinology Guidelines For Management Of Dyslipidemia And Prevention Of Cardiovascular Disease - Executive Summary
Published in
Endocrine Practice, February 2017
DOI 10.4158/ep171764.gl
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paul S. Jellinger, Yehuda Handelsman, Paul D. Rosenblit, Zachay T. Bloomgarden, Vivian A. Fonseca, Al.an J. Garber, George Grunberger, Chris K. Guerin, DavidS H. Bell, Jeffrey I. Mechanick, Rachel Pessah-Pollack, Kathlen Wyne, Donal Smith, Eliot A. Brinton, Sergio Fazio, Michel Davidson, Farhd Zangeneh, Michel A. Bush

Abstract

The development of these guidelines is mandated by the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE) Board of Directors and American College of Endocrinology (ACE) Board of Trustees and adheres with published AACE protocols for the standardized production of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs). Each Recommendation is based on a diligent review of the clinical evidence with transparent incorporation of subjective factors. The Executive Summary of this document contains 87 Recommendations of which 45 are Grade A (51.7%), 18 are Grade B (20.7%), 15 are Grade C (17.2%), and 9 (10.3%) are Grade D. These detailed, evidence-based recommendations allow for nuance-based clinical decision-making that addresses multiple aspects of real-world medical care. The evidence base presented in the subsequent Appendix provides relevant supporting information for Executive Summary Recommendations. This update contains 695 citations of which 202 (29.1 %) are EL 1 (strong), 137 (19.7%) are EL 2 (intermediate), 119 (17.1%) are EL 3 (weak), and 237 (34.1%) are EL 4 (no clinical evidence). This CPG is a practical tool that endocrinologists can use to reduce the risks and consequences of dyslipidemia. It provides guidance on screening, risk assessment, and treatment recommendations for a range of patients with various lipid disorders. They emphasize the importance of treating low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) in some individuals to lower goals than previously recommended and support the measurement of coronary artery calcium scores and inflammatory markers to help stratify risk. Special consideration is given to patients with diabetes, familial hypercholesterolemia, women, and pediatric patients with dyslipidemia. Both clinical and cost-effectiveness data are provided to support treatment decision-making.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 349 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 349 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 52 15%
Researcher 35 10%
Other 34 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 9%
Student > Bachelor 28 8%
Other 80 23%
Unknown 90 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 139 40%
Nursing and Health Professions 30 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 20 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 10 3%
Other 34 10%
Unknown 104 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 74. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 January 2020.
All research outputs
#579,717
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Endocrine Practice
#37
of 1,139 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,682
of 424,986 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Endocrine Practice
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,139 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 424,986 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them