| Title |
Eligibility and Disqualification Recommendations for Competitive Athletes With Cardiovascular Abnormalities: Task Force 4: Congenital Heart Disease A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association and American College of Cardiology
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JACC, November 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.09.036 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
George F. Van Hare, Michael J. Ackerman, Juli-anne K. Evangelista, Richard J. Kovacs, Robert J. Myerburg, Keri M. Shafer, Carole A. Warnes, Reginald L. Washington |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Czechia | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 62 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 8 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 11% |
| Researcher | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 8% |
| Professor | 5 | 8% |
| Other | 20 | 31% |
| Unknown | 14 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 29 | 45% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 11% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 3% |
| Sports and Recreations | 2 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 22 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 March 2017.
All research outputs
#21,285,712
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from JACC
#15,596
of 17,045 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#221,620
of 300,136 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC
#230
of 257 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,045 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.0. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 300,136 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 257 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.