↓ Skip to main content

Cost effectiveness of cascade testing for familial hypercholesterolaemia, based on data from familial hypercholesterolaemia services in the UK

Overview of attention for article published in European Heart Journal, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
105 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
102 Mendeley
Title
Cost effectiveness of cascade testing for familial hypercholesterolaemia, based on data from familial hypercholesterolaemia services in the UK
Published in
European Heart Journal, April 2017
DOI 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx111
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marion Kerr, Robert Pears, Zofia Miedzybrodzka, Kate Haralambos, Moyra Cather, Melanie Watson, Steve E. Humphries

Abstract

Familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) is a vastly under-diagnosed genetic disorder, associated with early development of coronary heart disease and premature mortality which can be substantially reduced by effective treatment. Patents have recently expired on high-intensity statins, reducing FH treatment costs. We build a model using UK data to estimate the cost effectiveness of DNA testing of relatives of those with monogenic FH. A Markov model was used to estimate the cost effectiveness of cascade testing, using data from UK cascade services. The estimated incremental cost effectiveness ratio (ICER) was £5806 and the net marginal lifetime cost per relative tested was £2781. More than 80% of lifetime costs were diagnosis-related and incurred in the 1st year. In UK services, 23% of 6396 index cases were mutation-positive. For each mutation-positive index case, 1.33 relatives were tested, resulting overall in a rate of 0.31 tested relatives per tested index case. If the number of relatives tested per tested index case rose to 3.2 (projected by National Institute for Health and Care Excellence in 2008) the ICER would reduce to £2280 and lifetime costs to £1092. Cascade testing of relatives of those with suspected FH is highly cost effective. The current Europe-wide high levels of undiagnosed FH, and associated morbidity and mortality, mean adoption of cascade services should yield substantial quality of life and survival gains.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 101 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 21 21%
Researcher 11 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 11%
Student > Bachelor 9 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 9%
Other 20 20%
Unknown 21 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 41 40%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 11%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 6 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Other 11 11%
Unknown 25 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 38. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2018.
All research outputs
#936,776
of 23,340,595 outputs
Outputs from European Heart Journal
#1,431
of 10,177 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,651
of 310,410 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Heart Journal
#19
of 168 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,340,595 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,177 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 310,410 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 168 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.