↓ Skip to main content

Predicting the impact of Lynch syndrome-causing missense mutations from structural calculations

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Genetics, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
7 X users

Readers on

mendeley
94 Mendeley
Title
Predicting the impact of Lynch syndrome-causing missense mutations from structural calculations
Published in
PLoS Genetics, April 2017
DOI 10.1371/journal.pgen.1006739
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sofie V. Nielsen, Amelie Stein, Alexander B. Dinitzen, Elena Papaleo, Michael H. Tatham, Esben G. Poulsen, Maher M. Kassem, Lene J. Rasmussen, Kresten Lindorff-Larsen, Rasmus Hartmann-Petersen

Abstract

Accurate methods to assess the pathogenicity of mutations are needed to fully leverage the possibilities of genome sequencing in diagnosis. Current data-driven and bioinformatics approaches are, however, limited by the large number of new variations found in each newly sequenced genome, and often do not provide direct mechanistic insight. Here we demonstrate, for the first time, that saturation mutagenesis, biophysical modeling and co-variation analysis, performed in silico, can predict the abundance, metabolic stability, and function of proteins inside living cells. As a model system, we selected the human mismatch repair protein, MSH2, where missense variants are known to cause the hereditary cancer predisposition disease, known as Lynch syndrome. We show that the majority of disease-causing MSH2 mutations give rise to folding defects and proteasome-dependent degradation rather than inherent loss of function, and accordingly our in silico modeling data accurately identifies disease-causing mutations and outperforms the traditionally used genetic disease predictors. Thus, in conclusion, in silico biophysical modeling should be considered for making genotype-phenotype predictions and for diagnosis of Lynch syndrome, and perhaps other hereditary diseases.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 1%
Unknown 93 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 21%
Student > Master 15 16%
Student > Bachelor 15 16%
Professor 6 6%
Researcher 6 6%
Other 13 14%
Unknown 19 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 40 43%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 14%
Chemistry 7 7%
Computer Science 3 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 3%
Other 6 6%
Unknown 22 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2021.
All research outputs
#2,687,646
of 25,806,080 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Genetics
#2,221
of 9,003 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,722
of 325,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Genetics
#67
of 175 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,080 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,003 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,379 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 175 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.