↓ Skip to main content

Sharing data under the 21st Century Cures Act

Overview of attention for article published in Genetics in Medicine, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
3 policy sources
twitter
7 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
Title
Sharing data under the 21st Century Cures Act
Published in
Genetics in Medicine, May 2017
DOI 10.1038/gim.2017.59
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mary A Majumder, Christi J Guerrini, Juli M Bollinger, Robert Cook-Deegan, Amy L McGuire

Abstract

On 13 December 2016, President Obama signed the 21st Century Cures Act ("the Act") into law. Many of its provisions support the creation of an "Information Commons," an ecosystem of separate but interconnected initiatives that facilitate open and responsible sharing of genomic and other data for research and clinical purposes. For example, the Act supports the National Institutes of Health in mandating data sharing, provides funding and guidance for the large national cohort program now known as All of Us, expresses congressional support for a global pediatric study network, and strengthens patient access to health information. The Act also addresses potential barriers to data sharing. For example, it makes the issuance of certificates of confidentiality automatic for federally funded research involving "identifiable, sensitive" information and strengthens the associated protections. At the same time, the Act exacerbates or neglects several challenges, for example, increasing complexity by adding a new definition of "identifiable" and failing to address the financial sustainability of data sharing and the scope of commercialization. In sum, the Act is a positive step, yet there is still much work to be done before the goals of broad data sharing and utilization can be achieved.GENETICS in MEDICINE advance online publication, 25 May 2017; doi:10.1038/gim.2017.59.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 40 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 6 15%
Student > Master 5 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 13%
Unspecified 4 10%
Researcher 4 10%
Other 9 23%
Unknown 7 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 20%
Social Sciences 5 13%
Unspecified 4 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 10%
Computer Science 2 5%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 12 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 December 2022.
All research outputs
#1,793,847
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Genetics in Medicine
#612
of 2,945 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,767
of 327,070 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genetics in Medicine
#15
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,945 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,070 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.