↓ Skip to main content

Recommendations for Surveillance for Children with Leukemia-Predisposing Conditions

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Cancer Research, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
78 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
116 Mendeley
Title
Recommendations for Surveillance for Children with Leukemia-Predisposing Conditions
Published in
Clinical Cancer Research, May 2017
DOI 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-17-0428
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christopher C. Porter, Todd E. Druley, Ayelet Erez, Roland P. Kuiper, Kenan Onel, Joshua D. Schiffman, Kami Wolfe Schneider, Sarah R. Scollon, Hamish S. Scott, Louise C. Strong, Michael F. Walsh, Kim E. Nichols

Abstract

Leukemia, the most common childhood cancer, has long been recognized to occasionally run in families. The first clues about the genetic mechanisms underlying familial leukemia emerged in 1990 when Li-Fraumeni syndrome was linked to TP53 mutations. Since this discovery, many other genes associated with hereditary predisposition to leukemia have been identified. Although several of these disorders also predispose individuals to solid tumors, certain conditions exist in which individuals are specifically at increased risk to develop myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and/or acute leukemia. The increasing identification of affected individuals and families has raised questions around the efficacy, timing, and optimal methods of surveillance. As part of the AACR Childhood Cancer Predisposition Workshop, an expert panel met to review the spectrum of leukemia-predisposing conditions, with the aim to develop consensus recommendations for surveillance for pediatric patients. The panel recognized that for several conditions, routine monitoring with complete blood counts and bone marrow evaluations is essential to identify disease evolution and enable early intervention with allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. However, for others, less intensive surveillance may be considered. Because few reports describing the efficacy of surveillance exist, the recommendations derived by this panel are based on opinion, and local experience and will need to be revised over time. The development of registries and clinical trials is urgently needed to enhance understanding of the natural history of the leukemia-predisposing conditions, such that these surveillance recommendations can be optimized to further enhance long-term outcomes. Clin Cancer Res; 23(11); e14-e22. ©2017 AACRSee all articles in the online-only CCR Pediatric Oncology Series.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 116 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 115 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 19 16%
Researcher 15 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 9%
Student > Master 10 9%
Student > Bachelor 8 7%
Other 30 26%
Unknown 24 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 55 47%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Chemistry 3 3%
Other 6 5%
Unknown 29 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2019.
All research outputs
#2,049,982
of 23,573,233 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Cancer Research
#1,665
of 12,779 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,599
of 317,224 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Cancer Research
#44
of 218 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,573,233 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,779 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,224 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 218 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.