| Title |
Data Sharing Statements for Clinical Trials: A Requirement of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, June 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1001/jama.2017.6514 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Darren B. Taichman, Peush Sahni, Anja Pinborg, Larry Peiperl, Christine Laine, Astrid James, Sung-Tae Hong, Abraham Haileamlak, Laragh Gollogly, Fiona Godlee, Frank A. Frizelle, Fernando Florenzano, Jeffrey M. Drazen, Howard Bauchner, Christopher Baethge, Joyce Backus |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 150 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 44 | 29% |
| United Kingdom | 11 | 7% |
| Spain | 7 | 5% |
| France | 5 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 3 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 3 | 2% |
| Canada | 3 | 2% |
| New Zealand | 2 | 1% |
| Japan | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 23 | 15% |
| Unknown | 47 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 80 | 53% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 35 | 23% |
| Scientists | 33 | 22% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 30 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 5 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 17% |
| Professor | 3 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Unknown | 10 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 27% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 13% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Unknown | 11 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 109. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2021.
All research outputs
#386,396
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#4,530
of 36,428 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,269
of 328,322 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#117
of 393 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 36,428 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 72.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,322 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 393 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.