↓ Skip to main content

Enfermedades vasculares del hígado. Guías Clínicas de la Sociedad Catalana de Digestología y de la Asociación Española para el Estudio del Hígado

Overview of attention for article published in Gastroenterología y Hepatología (ScienceDirect), June 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
Title
Enfermedades vasculares del hígado. Guías Clínicas de la Sociedad Catalana de Digestología y de la Asociación Española para el Estudio del Hígado
Published in
Gastroenterología y Hepatología (ScienceDirect), June 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.gastrohep.2017.03.011
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marta Martín-Llahí, Agustín Albillos, Rafael Bañares, Annalisa Berzigotti, M. Ángeles García-Criado, Joan Genescà, Virginia Hernández-Gea, Elba Llop-Herrera, Helena Masnou-Ridaura, José Mateo, Carmen A. Navascués, Ángela Puente, Marta Romero-Gutiérrez, Macarena Simón-Talero, Luis Téllez, Fanny Turon, Cándido Villanueva, Roberto Zarrabeitia, Juan Carlos García-Pagán

Abstract

Despite their relatively low prevalence, vascular diseases of the liver represent a significant health problem in the field of liver disease. A common characteristic shared by many such diseases is their propensity to cause portal hypertension together with increased morbidity and mortality. These diseases are often diagnosed in young patients and their delayed diagnosis and/or inappropriate treatment can greatly reduce life expectancy. This article reviews the current body of evidence concerning Budd-Chiari syndrome, non-cirrhotic portal vein thrombosis, idiopathic portal hypertension, sinusoidal obstruction syndrome, hepatic vascular malformations in hereditary haemorrhagic telangiectasia, cirrhotic portal vein thrombosis and other rarer vascular diseases including arterioportal fistulas. It also includes a section on the diagnostic imaging of vascular diseases of the liver and their treatment from a haematological standpoint (study of thrombotic diathesis and anticoagulation therapy). All recommendations are based on published studies extracted from PubMed. The quality of evidence and strength of recommendations were rated in accordance with the GRADE system (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment Development and Evaluation). In the absence of sufficient evidence, recommendations were based on the opinion of the committee that produced the guide.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 64 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 11%
Student > Postgraduate 7 11%
Student > Bachelor 7 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 9%
Other 4 6%
Other 8 13%
Unknown 25 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Unspecified 1 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Psychology 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 30 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 June 2017.
All research outputs
#20,660,571
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Gastroenterología y Hepatología (ScienceDirect)
#455
of 644 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#255,277
of 331,811 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Gastroenterología y Hepatología (ScienceDirect)
#9
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 644 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,811 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.