↓ Skip to main content

Genome-wide association and interaction studies of CSF T-tau/Aβ42 ratio in ADNI cohort

Overview of attention for article published in Neurobiology of Aging, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Genome-wide association and interaction studies of CSF T-tau/Aβ42 ratio in ADNI cohort
Published in
Neurobiology of Aging, May 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2017.05.007
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jin Li, Qiushi Zhang, Feng Chen, Xianglian Meng, Wenjie Liu, Dandan Chen, Jingwen Yan, Sungeun Kim, Lei Wang, Weixing Feng, Andrew J. Saykin, Hong Liang, Li Shen, Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative

Abstract

The pathogenic relevance in Alzheimer's disease (AD) presents a decrease of cerebrospinal fluid amyloid-ß42 (Aß42) burden and an increase in cerebrospinal fluid total tau (T-tau) levels. In this work, we performed genome-wide association study (GWAS) and genome-wide interaction study of T-tau/Aß42 ratio as an AD imaging quantitative trait on 843 subjects and 563,980 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in ADNI cohort. We aim to identify not only SNPs with significant main effects but also SNPs with interaction effects to help explain "missing heritability". Linear regression method was used to detect SNP-SNP interactions among SNPs with uncorrected p-value ≤0.01 from the GWAS. Age, gender, and diagnosis were considered as covariates in both studies. The GWAS results replicated the previously reported AD-related genes APOE, APOC1, and TOMM40, as well as identified 14 novel genes, which showed genome-wide statistical significance. Genome-wide interaction study revealed 7 pairs of SNPs meeting the cell-size criteria and with bonferroni-corrected p-value ≤0.05. As we expect, these interaction pairs all had marginal main effects but explained a relatively high-level variance of T-tau/Aß42, demonstrating their potential association with AD pathology.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Unknown 56 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 18%
Student > Master 9 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 12%
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Other 4 7%
Other 9 16%
Unknown 13 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 8 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 7%
Computer Science 4 7%
Other 11 19%
Unknown 17 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 August 2017.
All research outputs
#3,562,512
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Neurobiology of Aging
#1,398
of 4,418 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,597
of 324,748 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neurobiology of Aging
#47
of 96 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,418 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,748 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 96 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.