↓ Skip to main content

Surveillance Recommendations for Children with Overgrowth Syndromes and Predisposition to Wilms Tumors and Hepatoblastoma

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Cancer Research, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
145 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
118 Mendeley
Title
Surveillance Recommendations for Children with Overgrowth Syndromes and Predisposition to Wilms Tumors and Hepatoblastoma
Published in
Clinical Cancer Research, July 2017
DOI 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-17-0710
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jennifer M. Kalish, Leslie Doros, Lee J. Helman, Raoul C. Hennekam, Roland P. Kuiper, Saskia M. Maas, Eamonn R. Maher, Kim E. Nichols, Sharon E. Plon, Christopher C. Porter, Surya Rednam, Kris Ann P. Schultz, Lisa J. States, Gail E. Tomlinson, Kristin Zelley, Todd E. Druley

Abstract

A number of genetic syndromes have been linked to increased risk for Wilms tumor (WT), hepatoblastoma (HB), and other embryonal tumors. Here, we outline these rare syndromes with at least a 1% risk to develop these tumors and recommend uniform tumor screening recommendations for North America. Specifically, for syndromes with increased risk for WT, we recommend renal ultrasounds every 3 months from birth (or the time of diagnosis) through the seventh birthday. For HB, we recommend screening with full abdominal ultrasound and alpha-fetoprotein serum measurements every 3 months from birth (or the time of diagnosis) through the fourth birthday. We recommend that when possible, these patients be evaluated and monitored by cancer predisposition specialists. At this time, these recommendations are not based on the differential risk between different genetic or epigenetic causes for each syndrome, which some European centers have implemented. This differentiated approach largely represents distinct practice environments between the United States and Europe, and these guidelines are designed to be a broad framework within which physicians and families can work together to implement specific screening. Further study is expected to lead to modifications of these recommendations. Clin Cancer Res; 23(13); e115-e22. ©2017 AACRSee all articles in the online-only CCR Pediatric Oncology Series.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 118 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 118 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 27 23%
Researcher 14 12%
Student > Postgraduate 8 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 7%
Student > Bachelor 8 7%
Other 23 19%
Unknown 30 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 61 52%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 3%
Psychology 3 3%
Other 3 3%
Unknown 32 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 September 2021.
All research outputs
#5,941,655
of 22,985,065 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Cancer Research
#5,576
of 12,642 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,883
of 314,076 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Cancer Research
#124
of 265 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,985,065 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,642 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 314,076 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 265 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.