↓ Skip to main content

Diagnosis and Management of Osteopetrosis: Consensus Guidelines From the Osteopetrosis Working Group

Overview of attention for article published in JCEM, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
182 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
238 Mendeley
Title
Diagnosis and Management of Osteopetrosis: Consensus Guidelines From the Osteopetrosis Working Group
Published in
JCEM, June 2017
DOI 10.1210/jc.2017-01127
Pubmed ID
Authors

Calvin C Wu, Michael J Econs, Linda A DiMeglio, Karl L Insogna, Michael A Levine, Paul J Orchard, Weston P Miller, Anna Petryk, Eric T Rush, Dolores M Shoback, Leanne M Ward, Lynda E Polgreen

Abstract

Osteopetrosis encompasses a group of rare metabolic bone diseases characterized by impaired osteoclast activity or development, resulting in high bone mineral density. Existing guidelines focus on treatment of the severe infantile forms with hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), but do not address the management of patients with less severe forms for whom HCT is not the standard of care. Therefore, our objective was to develop expert consensus guidelines that would address the management of these patients. A modified Delphi method was used to build consensus among participants of the Osteopetrosis Working Group, with responses to an anonymous online survey used to identify areas of agreement and conflict and develop a follow up survey. The strength of recommendations and quality of evidence was graded using the GRADE system. Consensus was found in the areas of diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment. We recommend relying upon characteristic radiographic findings to make the diagnosis, and that genetic testing adds important information by identifying mutations associated with unique disease complications. We recommend ongoing monitoring for changes in mineral metabolism and other complications including cranial nerve impingement, anemia, leukopenia, and dental disease. We suggest that calcitriol should not be used in high doses and instead recommend symptom-based supportive therapy for disease complications since there remains no effective treatment for non-infantile osteopetrosis. Scarcity of published studies on osteopetrosis reduce the ability to develop evidence-based guidelines for the management of these patients. Expert opinion-based guidelines for this rare condition are nevertheless important to enable improved care.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 238 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 238 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 26 11%
Student > Bachelor 24 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 9%
Other 21 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 8%
Other 56 24%
Unknown 71 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 104 44%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 2%
Other 21 9%
Unknown 81 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 September 2022.
All research outputs
#4,660,989
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from JCEM
#3,581
of 15,434 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,051
of 328,359 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JCEM
#26
of 82 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,434 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,359 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 82 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.