| Title |
Guidelines for Pathologic Diagnosis of Malignant Mesothelioma: 2017 Update of the Consensus Statement From the International Mesothelioma Interest Group
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, July 2017
|
| DOI | 10.5858/arpa.2017-0124-ra |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Aliya Noor Husain, Thomas V Colby, Nelson G Ordóñez, Timothy Craig Allen, Richard Luther Attanoos, Mary Beth Beasley, Kelly Jo Butnor, Lucian R Chirieac, Andrew M Churg, Sanja Dacic, Françoise Galateau-Sallé, Allen Gibbs, Allen M Gown, Thomas Krausz, Leslie Anne Litzky, Alberto Marchevsky, Andrew G Nicholson, Victor Louis Roggli, Anupama K Sharma, William D Travis, Ann E Walts, Mark R Wick |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 116 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 23 | 20% |
| Spain | 16 | 14% |
| India | 10 | 9% |
| Turkey | 4 | 3% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 4 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 3% |
| Ecuador | 2 | 2% |
| Canada | 2 | 2% |
| Saudi Arabia | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 13 | 11% |
| Unknown | 37 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 67 | 58% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 23 | 20% |
| Scientists | 20 | 17% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 4% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 302 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 302 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 38 | 13% |
| Other | 33 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 26 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 24 | 8% |
| Other | 60 | 20% |
| Unknown | 95 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 126 | 42% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 28 | 9% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 8 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 6 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 25 | 8% |
| Unknown | 103 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 92. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2023.
All research outputs
#467,643
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine
#54
of 2,782 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,654
of 327,746 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine
#4
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,782 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,746 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.