↓ Skip to main content

Committee Opinion No. 690

Overview of attention for article published in Obstetrics & Gynecology, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
19 news outlets
blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
202 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
73 Mendeley
Title
Committee Opinion No. 690
Published in
Obstetrics & Gynecology, March 2017
DOI 10.1097/aog.0000000000001951
Pubmed ID
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 73 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 22%
Other 10 14%
Researcher 8 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 7%
Professor 4 5%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 20 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 26%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 4%
Unspecified 1 1%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 24 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 155. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 July 2022.
All research outputs
#265,217
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Obstetrics & Gynecology
#214
of 8,951 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,664
of 324,443 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Obstetrics & Gynecology
#2
of 95 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,951 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,443 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 95 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.