| Title |
Opening Pandora's box?: ethical issues in prenatal whole genome and exome sequencing
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Prenatal Diagnosis, August 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1002/pd.5114 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ruth Horn, Michael Parker |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 9 | 43% |
| Canada | 1 | 5% |
| South Africa | 1 | 5% |
| Australia | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 9 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 52% |
| Scientists | 7 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 124 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 20 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 10% |
| Other | 12 | 10% |
| Researcher | 11 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 18 | 15% |
| Unknown | 43 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 28 | 23% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 10 | 8% |
| Unknown | 49 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 January 2021.
All research outputs
#1,730,182
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Prenatal Diagnosis
#66
of 2,462 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,069
of 331,444 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Prenatal Diagnosis
#3
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,462 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,444 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.