↓ Skip to main content

Systemic Therapy for Patients With Advanced Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2–Positive Breast Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Clinical Oncology, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Readers on

mendeley
428 Mendeley
Title
Systemic Therapy for Patients With Advanced Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2–Positive Breast Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline
Published in
Journal of Clinical Oncology, May 2014
DOI 10.1200/jco.2013.54.0948
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sharon H Giordano, Sarah Temin, Jeffrey J Kirshner, Sarat Chandarlapaty, Jennie R Crews, Nancy E Davidson, Francisco J Esteva, Ana M Gonzalez-Angulo, Ian Krop, Jennifer Levinson, Nancy U Lin, Shanu Modi, Debra A Patt, Edith A Perez, Jane Perlmutter, Naren Ramakrishna, Eric P Winer

Abstract

To provide evidence-based recommendations to practicing oncologists and others on systemic therapy for patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) -positive advanced breast cancer. The American Society of Clinical Oncology convened a panel of medical oncology, radiation oncology, guideline implementation, and advocacy experts and conducted a systematic literature review from January 2009 to October 2012. Outcomes of interest included overall survival, progression-free survival (PFS), and adverse events. A total of 16 trials met the systematic review criteria. The CLEOPATRA trial found survival and PFS benefits for docetaxel, trastuzumab, and pertuzumab in first-line treatment, and the EMILIA trial found survival and PFS benefits for trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) in second-line treatment. T-DM1 also showed a third-line PFS benefit. One trial reported on duration of HER2-targeted therapy, and three others reported on endocrine therapy for patients with HER-positive advanced breast cancer. HER2-targeted therapy is recommended for patients with HER2-positive advanced breast cancer, except for those with clinical congestive heart failure or significantly compromised left ventricular ejection fraction, who should be evaluated on a case-by-case basis. Trastuzumab, pertuzumab, and taxane for first-line treatment and T-DM1 for second-line treatment are recommended. In the third-line setting, clinicians should offer other HER2-targeted therapy combinations or T-DM1 (if not previously administered) and may offer pertuzumab, if the patient has not previously received it. Optimal duration of chemotherapy is at least 4 to 6 months or until maximum response, depending on toxicity and in the absence of progression. HER2-targeted therapy can continue until time of progression or unacceptable toxicities. For patients with HER2-positive and estrogen receptor-positive/progesterone receptor-positive breast cancer, clinicians may recommend either standard first-line therapy or, for selected patients, endocrine therapy plus HER2-targeted therapy or endocrine therapy alone.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 428 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 3 <1%
Ecuador 2 <1%
Portugal 2 <1%
Austria 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Other 5 1%
Unknown 407 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 75 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 57 13%
Student > Master 52 12%
Other 49 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 32 7%
Other 101 24%
Unknown 62 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 208 49%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 34 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 31 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 29 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 2%
Other 35 8%
Unknown 82 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 100. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 June 2023.
All research outputs
#421,093
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Oncology
#837
of 22,043 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,593
of 241,899 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Oncology
#7
of 284 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,043 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,899 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 284 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.