↓ Skip to main content

Utilizing Population Controls in Rare-Variant Case-Parent Association Tests

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Human Genetics, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
Title
Utilizing Population Controls in Rare-Variant Case-Parent Association Tests
Published in
American Journal of Human Genetics, May 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.ajhg.2014.04.014
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yu Jiang, Glen A. Satten, Yujun Han, Michael P. Epstein, Erin L. Heinzen, David B. Goldstein, Andrew S. Allen

Abstract

There is great interest in detecting associations between human traits and rare genetic variation. To address the low power implicit in single-locus tests of rare genetic variants, many rare-variant association approaches attempt to accumulate information across a gene, often by taking linear combinations of single-locus contributions to a statistic. Using the right linear combination is key-an optimal test will up-weight true causal variants, down-weight neutral variants, and correctly assign the direction of effect for causal variants. Here, we propose a procedure that exploits data from population controls to estimate the linear combination to be used in an case-parent trio rare-variant association test. Specifically, we estimate the linear combination by comparing population control allele frequencies with allele frequencies in the parents of affected offspring. These estimates are then used to construct a rare-variant transmission disequilibrium test (rvTDT) in the case-parent data. Because the rvTDT is conditional on the parents' data, using parental data in estimating the linear combination does not affect the validity or asymptotic distribution of the rvTDT. By using simulation, we show that our new population-control-based rvTDT can dramatically improve power over rvTDTs that do not use population control information across a wide variety of genetic architectures. It also remains valid under population stratification. We apply the approach to a cohort of epileptic encephalopathy (EE) trios and find that dominant (or additive) inherited rare variants are unlikely to play a substantial role within EE genes previously identified through de novo mutation studies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 6%
Hong Kong 1 2%
Spain 1 2%
Luxembourg 1 2%
Unknown 46 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 35%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 19%
Student > Bachelor 4 8%
Professor 4 8%
Other 4 8%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 5 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 33%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 13%
Psychology 4 8%
Computer Science 3 6%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 7 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2014.
All research outputs
#16,046,765
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Human Genetics
#5,334
of 5,878 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#131,723
of 241,488 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Human Genetics
#31
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,878 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,488 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.