| Title |
Interlaboratory validation of an improved method for detection of Cyclospora cayetanensis in produce using a real-time PCR assay
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Food Microbiology, August 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.fm.2017.08.008 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Helen R. Murphy, Hediye Nese Cinar, Gopal Gopinath, Kathy E. Noe, Lacresha D. Chatman, Nancy E. Miranda, June H. Wetherington, Jason Neal-McKinney, Gabrielle S. Pires, Elizabeth Sachs, Kristopher J. Stanya, Cynthia L. Johnson, Fernanda S. Nascimento, Monica Santin, Aleksey Molokin, Mansour Samadpour, Harish Janagama, Amy Kahler, Candace Miller, Alexandre J. da Silva |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 45 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 6 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 9% |
| Researcher | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 20% |
| Unknown | 17 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 18% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 4% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 13% |
| Unknown | 23 | 51% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 November 2017.
All research outputs
#20,356,726
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Food Microbiology
#1,443
of 1,924 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#240,999
of 330,072 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Food Microbiology
#32
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,924 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,072 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.