↓ Skip to main content

Birth Prevalence Rates of Newborn Screening Disorders in Relation to Screening Practices in the United States

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Pediatrics, June 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users
patent
6 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
Title
Birth Prevalence Rates of Newborn Screening Disorders in Relation to Screening Practices in the United States
Published in
Journal of Pediatrics, June 2011
DOI 10.1016/j.jpeds.2011.04.011
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vicki S. Hertzberg, Cynthia F. Hinton, Bradford L. Therrell, Stuart K. Shapira

Abstract

To examine the associations between the first-tier-screening laboratory methods and criteria and the birth prevalence of congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH), phenylketonuria (PKU), and the sickle hemoglobinopathies occurring in the United States between 1991 and 2000.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 29 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 5 17%
Researcher 5 17%
Student > Master 4 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 10%
Student > Postgraduate 3 10%
Other 5 17%
Unknown 4 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 52%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 10%
Engineering 2 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 3%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 5 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 August 2023.
All research outputs
#2,577,618
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pediatrics
#1,466
of 12,461 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,808
of 124,578 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pediatrics
#7
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,461 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 124,578 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.