| Title |
Take stock of research ethics in human genome editing
|
|---|---|
| Published by |
Nature, September 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1038/549307a |
| Pubmed ID |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 311 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 61 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 16 | 5% |
| France | 13 | 4% |
| Spain | 12 | 4% |
| Canada | 10 | 3% |
| Australia | 7 | 2% |
| Italy | 6 | 2% |
| India | 5 | 2% |
| Germany | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 51 | 16% |
| Unknown | 125 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 205 | 66% |
| Scientists | 77 | 25% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 16 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 13 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 29 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 14% |
| Researcher | 4 | 14% |
| Professor | 3 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 10% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 5 | 17% |
| Unknown | 8 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 21% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 14% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 7% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 21% |
| Unknown | 8 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 260. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 November 2018.
All research outputs
#144,065
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#9,201
of 98,920 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,013
of 327,101 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#180
of 938 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98,920 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,101 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 938 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.