↓ Skip to main content

Easy-to-Use Decision Aids for Improved Cancer Family History Collection and Use Among Oncology Practices

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Clinical Oncology, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
Title
Easy-to-Use Decision Aids for Improved Cancer Family History Collection and Use Among Oncology Practices
Published in
Journal of Clinical Oncology, September 2014
DOI 10.1200/jco.2014.56.2942
Pubmed ID
Authors

Aisha S Sie, Han G Brunner, Nicoline Hoogerbrugge

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 33%
Unspecified 2 22%
Researcher 2 22%
Other 1 11%
Student > Master 1 11%
Other 0 0%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 2 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 22%
Psychology 1 11%
Unknown 2 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 October 2014.
All research outputs
#20,656,820
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Oncology
#20,191
of 22,046 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#181,727
of 248,622 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Oncology
#233
of 248 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,046 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.0. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 248,622 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 248 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.